This article compares the 여성알바 구인구직 working conditions of female workers in Japan and Korea, focusing on the key differences between the two countries. Female boardroom representation remains a key metric for tracking the global progress on gender equality, and Japan deviates from the childcare-centric narrative. Japanese women fared worse than men more so because of Japanese women overrepresentation in non-regular and low-wage jobs, rather than because of childcare obligations. Japan deviates from the childcare-centric narrative. When it comes to the commemoration of wartime events, South Korea and Japan have quite different priorities, with South Korea placing a greater emphasis on scholarly cooperation between researchers from Japan, South Korea, and the United States.
On the other hand, Japan takes a far different strategy to dealing with its female workers than South Korea does in this regard. During the course of the last ten years, Japan has made efforts, via programs such as Nikkei Womanomics and IBM Japan’s manager training program, to expand the range of opportunities available to female workers in the workplace. Because of these activities, businesses seem to have become aware of the many compelling reasons why they should have a gender-diverse workforce that includes female workers. Nikkei Womanomics was developed as a means of enhancing the knowledge of communication with women and the attitudes that male managers have about women in the workplace on the part of male managers. The initiative also issued its “100 Best Businesses for Women” report, which polled over 2 million individuals in 2018, and it elevated 30 women executives into management positions at prominent corporations around the country of Japan. The goal of the manager training program that IBM Japan offered was to educate managers on how to improve their understanding of communication with female workers as well as other areas of diversity management.
As a result, there has been an increase in the number of women serving on boards of directors and in executive positions; in the year 2020, women will hold 38.6 percent of these positions. This is a considerable increase from the 16 percent of 2019 and represents an important milestone in the progression toward gender equality. Nonetheless, wage employment continues to be an important statistic for tracking worldwide progress in gender equality, and Japan continues to fall below the average for the rest of the world.
According to Figure 2, Japan has the lowest overall level of female labor force participation compared to urban China, South Korea, and the worldwide average. This is owing, in part, to the fact that Japanese women continue to have a disproportionately high rate of leaving the workforce to care for their children after giving birth. In contrast, South Korea has a far higher percentage of female labor force participation than Japan does. This may be linked to its childcare-centric narrative, which assists women in balancing paid job with the responsibilities of caring for their children.
Yet, despite having the greatest female labor force participation rate of the three nations, Japan’s occupational results are still below those of China and South Korea. In addition, although Japan has a larger proportion of women working full-time jobs, there are much fewer women holding management and upper managerial positions. Another factor that brings attention to the gender disparity in Japan’s labor market is the prevalence of female employees who have been laid off. This highlights the gendered nature of the care employment system, which has a disproportionately negative impact on women. In contrast, China has made great strides in closing the gender gap by expanding the number of possibilities available to female workers in management positions and by providing incentives like paid maternity leave to encourage more women to participate in the workforce. As a result of the adoption of laws that encourage full-time work for both sexes, it also has one of the lowest rates of part-time employment among women, making it one of the countries with the lowest rates overall.
It is believed that there are 40 million people now employed in Japan, making it the second biggest labor market in the world after South Korea. Japan has one of the most modern economies and a bigger female labor force than most other nations, yet it still has a huge gender gap in its labor market. This is despite the fact that Japan is one of the most advanced economies. This disparity is the result of Japan’s comprehensive tax regulations and legislation, both of which limit the work choices available to women. As a result, Japan loses millions of dollars’ worth of production every year.
The findings of comparative research on the creation of wartime historical memories in Japan and Korea show unequivocal evidence of a substantial difference in the respective countries’ collective memories. The potency and permanency of Japanese wartime narratives, especially those of cooperation, teaching class, and battle, have been claimed by academics to have been a significant factor in the formation of the identity of the Japanese nation. During World War II, nations such as Japan used women as a source of work force in East Asia. The evidence from this time period throughout the war demonstrates the significant gap that exists between the national memory of the two nations with regard to the commemoration of the conflict. While South Korea has focused on the collective trauma and victimization that was caused by Japanese colonization, Japan has not only avoided discussing its own involvement in the war but also discussed its own victims less than South Korea has. South Korea has focused on the collective trauma and victimization that was caused by Japanese colonization. This hesitation has been ascribed to a lack of awareness of their position as aggressors or collaborators during World War II as well as an unwillingness to address their history. Moreover, it has been suggested that this reluctance stems from an inability to confront their past. In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of collaborative projects that aim to bridge this gap between the perspectives of Japanese and Korean people. These projects include the teaching of classes on the war memories of both countries as well as cultural exchanges between students from both countries.
This is because many Japanese businesses have a policy that prohibits them from hiring Korean workers. The Japanese government has justified this policy by arguing that doing so would compromise the country’s national security. Both South Korea and Japan have voiced their disapproval of this move, with some Japanese commentators pointing to the lingering effects of colonialism and conflict that exist between the two nations. Many people in both nations believe that employing Koreans poses a challenge to their sense of identity and rejects the whole idea that they may have fundamental interactions with one another. This perspective has been discussed, as has the nationalist mindset of both countries. This volatile combination has contributed to the escalation of tensions between the two nations, who were only recently successful in resolving unresolved bilateral concerns via diplomatic discussions. Since Japan and South Korea are still technically at war with one another, it is abundantly evident that any business that seeks to bridge this divide has to proceed with extreme caution if it hopes to avoid being entangled in the identity politics of both of these countries.
Although there have been many efforts made to try to enhance the connection between both nations, the factors that have actually made a difference are the specific aspects of female workers in Japan that are different from those in Korea. After the declaration that Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe will re-apologize for Japan’s participation in World War II in December 2015, South Korean Foreign Minister Yun Byung-se made the statement that the two countries would engage in bilateral security discussions. These conversations served to foster a dialogue between the two parties involved and contributed to the development of a fresh understanding of the past they had in common.
The gendered expectations of childcare that exist in Japan are being challenged by female workers, who are also working to increase gender diversity in the workplace. Women in South Korea are gaining independence and making strides in their respective nations as a result of laws, programs, and efforts that encourage participation in the labor sector. The Gross Domestic Product of each country may see an increase as a result of this endeavor, which would be beneficial to the governments of both nations. Company surveys have shown that Japanese women are more likely to remain in their jobs for a longer period of time than men due to the reason behind career opportunities, workplace environment, corporate management approach, etc. The cooperation between the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea is a strong example of shared global interests for security and prosperity. According to the findings of a survey that was carried out by a company across three countries – the United States, South Korea, and Japan – it was discovered that Japanese companies score higher than those in South Korea when it comes to their labor policies for the status of their female employees. The findings indicate that Japan is making progress relative to other nations assessed in the direction of improving working conditions for female employees.